Skip to main content

Maritime Law: Save Florida Keys Fishing!!!

Since I was away for vacation earlier this month, I am now trying to play "blogging catch-up". Apologies to my regular readers if you begin receiving too much content at one time--I cannot control when Blogger disseminates my postings after they are published.

However, there is one very important development that has occurred while I was away and is near and dear to all of us that fish the beautiful waters of the Florida Keys. A reportedly "anti-fishing" group called Ecosystem Protection Working Group ("EPWG") have made recommendations to increase the areas of the Florida Keys that are protected from fishing. The Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary ("FKNMS") is already one of the largest marine protected areas ("MPAs") in the country. The FKNMS MPA currently measures approximately 496 million square yards of ocean and reef.

EPWG is recommending that authorities expand the MPA by another 310 million square yards of ocean and reef. This would effectively close fishing from the Marquesas past the reef, Sand Key and Rock Key Reefs, almost every reef south of Key West and the entire outer bar past Western Dry Rocks to Eastern Dry Rocks. If this expanded MPA is implemented, this would effectively "lock out" over 800 million square yards of ocean and reef to fishing.

 The EPWG map setting out the expanded MPA is provided below:
 
Map courtesy of Outdoor Alliance at http://outdoor-alliance.org/articles/petition-keys.

I have looked into this proposal by the EPWG and it would appear that the proposal is not backed up by scientific need determined by marine biologists. The article link above explains this in more detail and has helpful links to the copies of the various individual areas (Western Sambo, Tortugas, Carysfort Reef, Grassy Key, Conch Key, Sombrero Key, Tennessee Reef, Looe Key, Western Dry Rocks, Marquesas, Elbow Reef, Key Largo, Grecian Rocks, French Reef, Molasses Reef, Hen and Checkens (yes this is an area), Conch Reef, Davis Reef, Cheeca Rocks, Alligator Reef, Coffins Patch, Newfound Harbor, Eastern Dry Rocks, Rock Key, Sand Key, Snapper Ledge/Pickles Reef) proposed. You will see in the various charts provided by EPWG that the "justifications" listed to justify the expanded areas do not quote the scientific bases for these expanded MPAs. Thus, it can only be presumed that there is no scientific basis for these recommendations and this is merely an attempt to "grab" more MPA areas, to the detriment of the Florida Keys and those of us that love the Keys. I personally am willing to accept conservation, if there is science to back it up.

If you are interested in letting your voice be heard in this process, the Outdoor Alliance has provided a petition with a link. If you are interested in contacting me, you may do so at mov@chaloslaw.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maritime Law--Florida's Arbitration Code Is Now Revised

Those of us that practice maritime law regularly must always be on the lookout for the contract that may contain an arbitration clause. Thus, any laws related to arbitration are important to those of us practicing in this sector.       The Florida legislature has revised the Florida Arbitration Code ("FAC") and named it the Revised Florida Arbitration Code (the " Revised Act"). Since 1967, the FAC had gone mostly unchanged. The Revised Act addresses concepts that were not addressed in the old law, such as the ability of arbitrators to issue provision remedies, challenges based on notice, consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings, required conflict disclosures by arbitrators, among other major changes. The Revised Act lays out a detailed framework for international arbitration conducted under Florida law and repeals sections of the FAC. The Revised Act spells out what experienced arbitrators knew the case law to be, but codifies it all in one pl

Maritime Law--U.S. Crewmember Required to Arbitrate Claims Applying Norwegian Law

In Alberts v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd ., No. 15-14775 (11th Cir. Aug. 23, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a U.S. citizen, working aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise ship is required to arbitrate his claims against Royal Caribbean. Plaintiff, a United States citizen, worked as the lead trumpeter on a passenger Royal Caribbean cruise ship. The ship is a Bahamian flagged vessel with a home port in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Royal Caribbean, the operator of the vessel, is a Liberian corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. After plaintiff became ill while working for Royal Caribbean, he filed suit alleging unseaworthiness, negligence, negligence under the Jones Act, maintenance and cure, and seaman’s wages and penalties. Royal Caribbean moved to compel arbitration, and the district court granted the motion. This appeal presented an issue of first impression: Whether a seaman’s work in international waters on a cruise ship

Maritime Law--Jury Hits Royal Caribbean Cruises With $20.3M Verdict for Officer's Hand Injury

In Spearman v. Royal Caribbean Cruises , Case No. 2011-023730-CA-01, a Miami-Dade County, Florida jury has awarded $20.3 million to a former crewmember of Royal Caribbean Cruises, whose hand was crushed while coming to the aid of a fellow worker during an emergency test in 2008. After a three-week trial, the jury found the Miami-based cruise company negligent in operating an unseaworthy ship and 100 percent liable for the injuries suffered by Lisa Spearman, who was working an officer on Royal Caribbean’s Voyager of the Seas . Spearman sued the company in 2011, three years after her right hand was caught in a watertight power door during a fire-safety drill. According to her lawyers, Spearman was trying to prevent the door from closing on the ship’s nurse when her hand was pulled into a recess pocket of the sliding door and crushed.  The nurse allegedly breached the company’s safety protocol when she stumbled through the door, prompting the response from Spearman. Accordin