Skip to main content

Maritime Law--Key Biscayne Sues Again Over Miami's Plan for Marine Stadium

It is reported that less than two weeks after agreeing to try to hammer out a deal, Key Biscayne has filed a third lawsuit over Miami's plan to redevelop Virginia Key. The June 25th petition filed in Miami-Dade Circuit Court is looking to push back the construction that the City of Miami is pursuing around the decaying Miami Marine Stadium.


In one corner, Miami plans to spend $16 million to turn the entrance and several vacant parcels next to the waterfront stadium into a "flex park" capable of hosting large events. Because some of the construction is on historically designated stadium grounds, the City obtained a special dispensation from the historic preservation board and the City Commission in May.

In the other corner, the Village of Key Biscayne maintains that the special dispensation was improvidently granted. The Village claims Miami officials prevented the board from hearing evidence about future uses in violation of Miami's own code. Key Biscayne also claims permission was rushed and lacked all the needed documentation, and the Miami city attorney's office showed bias during the hearing to approve the permit. This latest lawsuit is the Village's third court action over redevelopment of the stadium and surrounding land.

The Miami Marine Stadium, a 1963 marine amphitheater on Biscayne Bay, has been a venue of major contention. Last November, the nonprofit group Friends of Miami Marine Stadium was working behind the scenes to push a plan to renovate the stadium. The non-profit failed to consult Key Biscayne politicians before they held a glitzy event announcing the stadium renovation, which of course, prompted outrage from the politicians who feared a large development on the stadium site. 

Then in February, Key Biscayne filed a complaint in Miami-Dade Circuit Court after the City of Miami independently pushed plans to redevelop the stadium site and bring the Miami International Boat Show there as an anchor tenant. Key Biscayne sought an emergency injunction when Miami began preliminary site work with the lawsuit pending.

On April 22nd, the Village filed a second lawsuit against the boat show operator. Key Biscayne has portrayed a boat show on Virginia Key as a traffic and environmental catastrophe. It does not help that contractors doing preliminary work in the basin near the stadium chopped down hundreds of square feet of protected mangroves.

Now this latest lawsuit could affect a scheduled mediation that is supposed to be taking place between the City and the Village. The public comments made by the Village is that the lawsuit was not intended to affect the mediation but was filed to avoid missing the 30-day deadline for challenging the City's action in the Circuit Court. It is true that there is a 30-day deadline to challenge administrative actions. It is reported that some politicians at the City of Miami may now be "back pedaling" due to the "intrusiveness" of the proposed project. Both sides state that the stadium should be renovated, but they are bitterly divided on how this should be done.
 
Those of us that rely on the marine industry hope that the politicians can work through this for the benefit of the industry.
 
If you are interested in reaching me, you may do so by writing to me at mov@chaloslaw.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ReThink + ReUse Center "It's How We Roll" Fun Raiser -- Bowling Night -- October 16, 2014

As many of my readers may be aware, I am the Chair of the ReThink + ReUse Center, a non-for-profit educational and environmental Center in Miami educating children into rethinking reuseable materials for learning through play. The ReThink and ReUse Center’s Quality Play is Learning Program provides a series of educational and participatory workshops based on the philosophies of Reggio Emilia and Harvard's Project Zero Visible Thinking. The Children’s Trust is the major funder of this program, but the Center is required to continually fundraise for the balance its annual budget.   The Center is having a fun event you are invited to--the ReThink + Reuse Center’s “It’s How We Roll” bowling event on October 16, 2014 at Splitsville Luxury Lanes from 18:00 to 21:30 hours. My firm, Comcast and Waste Management are major sponsors for this event, but we could use a few more sponsors. If you are interested in sponsoring the event, please let me know by reaching me at mov@chalos...
6 comments
Read more

Maritime Law--Florida's Arbitration Code Is Now Revised

Those of us that practice maritime law regularly must always be on the lookout for the contract that may contain an arbitration clause. Thus, any laws related to arbitration are important to those of us practicing in this sector.       The Florida legislature has revised the Florida Arbitration Code ("FAC") and named it the Revised Florida Arbitration Code (the " Revised Act"). Since 1967, the FAC had gone mostly unchanged. The Revised Act addresses concepts that were not addressed in the old law, such as the ability of arbitrators to issue provision remedies, challenges based on notice, consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings, required conflict disclosures by arbitrators, among other major changes. The Revised Act lays out a detailed framework for international arbitration conducted under Florida law and repeals sections of the FAC. The Revised Act spells out what experienced arbitrators knew the case law to be, but codifies it all in one pl...
4 comments
Read more

Maritime Law--Lozman Case Revisited in Miami?

In Hoefling v. City of Miami , Case no.: 14-12482 (11th Cir. Jan. 25, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit revived almost all of Hoefling's claims. You ask, "Who is Hoefling?" Hoefling  lived on his sailboat Metis O moored off Dinner Key for nearly a decade—until the day he came home and it was gone. About three months earlier, an officer from the Miami Police Department's Marine Patrol Detail tagged Hoefling's vessel for lacking a sanitary device and a working anchor light. He had a deal to use the facilities at the nearby marina but quickly went out and reportedly bought what he needed to comply. Three months later while he was on a business trip, the City of Miami seized and destroyed his boat and all his belongings. As a result, he was homeless. He sued under § 1983, maritime law, and state law. He stated a claim under the Fourth Amendment for seizure and destruction without notice or cause and a “taking.”    At the ...
5 comments
Read more