Skip to main content

North American Emissions Control Area Is Now Here

The North American Emissions Control Area ("NAECA") entered into force last August and included a one-year grace period to give the various enforcement agencies and the maritime community sufficient time to adapt to the new regulations. The grace period ended on August 1, 2012.

The NAECA covers nearly all coastal waters of the United States and Canada out to 200 nautical miles from their coasts. A chart of the area concerned is found below:



Within the ECA, ships and yachts of 400 gross tons and above are required to reduce harmful air emissions by adopting one of three approved alternatives:

1. Use fuel with a sulfur content that does not exceed 1.0 %;


2. Utilize an exhaust gas cleaning system approved by its flag administration in accordance with IMO guidelines; or


3. Adopt any other technological method that is verifiable, enforceable, and has been approved by its flag administration in accordance with IMO guidelines.


Where applicable, vessels that burn more than one type of fuel must maintain detailed records regarding fuel changeovers. All vessels must continue the current requirement of retaining bunker delivery notes and samples. Beginning on January 1, 1015, the maximum sulfur content in fuel oil will lower to 0.1%. Vessels that operate predominately in coastal and inland areas of this area will potentially incur the most added costs, as those vessels will constantly operate within the NAECA.

An issue of importance is that ECA-compliant fuel will generally need to be obtained by a vessel prior to sailing for an NAECA port. This is because the obligation to utilize the low-sulfur oil arises when the vessel comes within 200 nautical miles of the NAECA. There have been numerous commentaries questioning the availability of NAECA-compliant fuel outside of the NAECA. Some suggest that vessels will have to carry a certain quantity of ECA-compliant fuel to enter the NAECA; others suggest vessels will have to divert at considerable expense and delay.

There is also some controversy, as an attempt has been made by foreign-flagged cruise ships that operate out of the NAECA. They state that they deserve a modification to the rules or some type of dispensation, as they spend a large percentage of their time underway within the NAECA. To date, such requests have been unanswered by the regulatory authorities.

I have a copy of a report from The Triton magazine related to the affect of the NAECA on yachts. If you are interested in receiving a scanned copy of this article or wish to contact me, you may do so by writing to me at miamipandi@comcast.net or mov@chaloslaw.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maritime Law--U.S. Crewmember Required to Arbitrate Claims Applying Norwegian Law

In Alberts v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., No. 15-14775 (11th Cir. Aug. 23, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a U.S. citizen, working aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise ship is required to arbitrate his claims against Royal Caribbean.
Plaintiff, a United States citizen, worked as the lead trumpeter on a passenger Royal Caribbean cruise ship. The ship is a Bahamian flagged vessel with a home port in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Royal Caribbean, the operator of the vessel, is a Liberian corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. After plaintiff became ill while working for Royal Caribbean, he filed suit alleging unseaworthiness, negligence, negligence under the Jones Act, maintenance and cure, and seaman’s wages and penalties. Royal Caribbean moved to compel arbitration, and the district court granted the motion. This appeal presented an issue of first impression: Whether a seaman’s work in international waters on a cruise ship that calls o…

Maritime Law--Tour Boat Captain Implicated in Tragedy Off Nicaragua

As reported in the Daily Business Review on January 25, 2016, Nicaragua's police, army and navy will investigate the captain of a tourist boat and his assistant for the deaths of 13 Costa Rican passengers killed on January 23rd when the vessel capsized in bad weather. The Reina del Caribe, Spanish for "Caribbean Queen," was carrying 33 people when it went down Saturday amid rain and strong winds as it ferried between the Corn Islands, a popular tourist destination, off Nicaragua's Caribbean coast. The Daily Business Review article can be accessed here=> Daily Business Review article.

The government clarified on the 24th that the boat was carrying 25 Costa Ricans, two Americans, two British citizens, a Brazilian and three Nicaraguans. Previous reports had said there were 32 people on board, including four Americans. All the dead were Costa Ricans.

Nicaragua's naval commander for the southern Caribbean region said the boat's captain was detained because the …

Maritime Law--Lawsuits Filed Over RCCL's "Storm Cruise"

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd ("RCCL") faces lawsuits by passengers accusing the company of negligently endangering their lives by letting Anthem of the Seas sail into a February 7, 2016 storm.  One class action lawsuit filed in federal court in Miami specifically states that RCCL should be required to pay punitive damages to passengers on its ship for "knowingly sailing directly into" a strong winter storm with 120-mph winds. It is also alleged that people aboard the ship were "subjected to hours of sheer terror as the gigantic cruise ship was battered by hurricane-force winds and more than 30-foot waves."

The vessel reportedly encountered 100 mph winds and 30-foot waves, and RCCL said the storm was more severe than expected. RCCL later turned the ship around, and it returned to New Jersey on February 10. Anthem of the Seas’ port azipod reportedly burnt through “all four clutches” during the storm. RCCL reported four minor injuries among more than 6,000 p…