Skip to main content

The Key to Arbitration Clause Provisions is Careful Handling

Businesses often insert an arbitration clause in a contract based on the expectations that arbitration is cheaper and faster than a lawsuit. Unfortunately, a poorly drafted arbitration clause can lead to a messy legal dispute that is neither cheaper nor faster. Transaction-oriented lawyers have their strengths, and litigation is generally not one of them. As a result, they may not anticipate all of the ramifications of the provisions they insert in an arbitration clause. Sometimes an attorney borrows from a well-crafted contract that is ill-suited to the needs of the current client. In a sincere but misguided effort to cover all bases, an attorney may insert language that is overly expansive, overly restrictive or just plain impractical. This is particularly true in maritime matters.

In my years as a claims executive ultimately paying for arbitration proceedings, a lawyer appearing before arbitrators and advising clients on contracts that other lawyers have drafted, I have learned to analyze arbitration clauses in the same way that a coach may watch videotapes of games. Because there are various nuances to drafting arbitration clauses, it is good to highlight the most important questions when reviewing a proposed contract.

Set Goals
  • What do you want to accomplish? One reason for arbitration is to achieve a private resolution out of the eye of the public and competitors. The other main reasons are to avoid costly trials and drawn-out disputes.
  • What will be arbitrated and what will not? When asked, courts generally rule broadly regarding what is covered by arbitration. All issues in a construction contract should be--but tort claims, probably not.
  • Are provisions for arbitration consistent and harmonious with other provisions of the contract? If not, resolving conflicts and confusion within the document may protract and complicate the proceedings.
  • Is the arbitration nonbinding? If the answer is yes, then clearly, somebody was not thinking when writing the contract. If an arbitration ruling cannot be enforced, the two sides will still end up in court after going through a time-consuming and potentially expensive set of hearings or reluctantly unsatisfactorily reach a result that is less then satisfactory.
Choose Players
  • How many arbitrators? Base the number on the size of the contract. If it is a simple dispute, one arbitrator will do. If the agreement has complex issues and involves considerable money, you may want a panel of three. Remember that costs rise with the number of arbitrators.
  • Who chooses the arbitrators? Independent groups such as the American Arbitration Association, the Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Services and the Society of Maritime Arbitrators offer qualified individuals.
  • Who pays the arbitrators? The cost could be split between the two sides or paid by the loser in the dispute.
  • What are the roles of the arbitrators? A contract may say that each side picks one arbitrator and those two pick the third who manages the arbitration. If the clause fails to state that the first two arbitrators should act in a neutral fashion, they may be advocates and engage in a tug-of-war over the third to gain a 2-to-1 victory. This is less than ideal.
  • Can there be independent communication with the arbitrators? Yes, when the advocate arbitrators are not neutral. The two sides argue the case before the arbitration panel and separately talk to their arbitrator--not a good situation.
Keep Score
  • Will attorneys fees be awarded for the prevailing party? Not unless there is a provision for it in the contract.
  • What type of award may be made? Both sides should know ahead of time what they might gain or lose and why. There are multiple types of awards: standard (amount and breakdown), reasoned (arbitrator gives reasons) and findings of fact and conclusions of law (arbitrator makes findings). The more complicated and detailed the award, the more expensive. The type of award should be specified in the contract.
  • Does the winner take all? Use the legal standard of preponderance of the evidence in weighing how much to award to each side.
  • What rules apply? In the contract, pick rules of arbitration, either AAA, SMA or some other rules designated specifically for arbitration.
In summary, while company owners and managers expect attorneys to know how to draft every page of a contract--reality can fall short of expectations. A business should choose an attorney that is experienced in arbitration and contract drafting in the particular area of law to undertake this very important task. Undertaking this step by step analysis before signing on the dotted line is the difference between signing a contract and crossing fingers that all will ultimately come out ok and signing a contract, knowing that the language chosen is well suited for the business and risks that comes with that business.

If you are interested in contact me, please feel free to do so at miamipandi@comcast.net or motero@houckanderson.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maritime Law--U.S. Crewmember Required to Arbitrate Claims Applying Norwegian Law

In Alberts v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., No. 15-14775 (11th Cir. Aug. 23, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a U.S. citizen, working aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise ship is required to arbitrate his claims against Royal Caribbean.
Plaintiff, a United States citizen, worked as the lead trumpeter on a passenger Royal Caribbean cruise ship. The ship is a Bahamian flagged vessel with a home port in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Royal Caribbean, the operator of the vessel, is a Liberian corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. After plaintiff became ill while working for Royal Caribbean, he filed suit alleging unseaworthiness, negligence, negligence under the Jones Act, maintenance and cure, and seaman’s wages and penalties. Royal Caribbean moved to compel arbitration, and the district court granted the motion. This appeal presented an issue of first impression: Whether a seaman’s work in international waters on a cruise ship that calls o…

Maritime Law--Jury Hits Royal Caribbean Cruises With $20.3M Verdict for Officer's Hand Injury

In Spearman v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Case No. 2011-023730-CA-01, a Miami-Dade County, Florida jury has awarded $20.3 million to a former crewmember of Royal Caribbean Cruises, whose hand was crushed while coming to the aid of a fellow worker during an emergency test in 2008. After a three-week trial, the jury found the Miami-based cruise company negligent in operating an unseaworthy ship and 100 percent liable for the injuries suffered by Lisa Spearman, who was working an officer on Royal Caribbean’s Voyager of the Seas.



Spearman sued the company in 2011, three years after her right hand was caught in a watertight power door during a fire-safety drill. According to her lawyers, Spearman was trying to prevent the door from closing on the ship’s nurse when her hand was pulled into a recess pocket of the sliding door and crushed. The nurse allegedly breached the company’s safety protocol when she stumbled through the door, prompting the response from Spearman.
According to allegations m…

Maritime Law--Tour Boat Captain Implicated in Tragedy Off Nicaragua

As reported in the Daily Business Review on January 25, 2016, Nicaragua's police, army and navy will investigate the captain of a tourist boat and his assistant for the deaths of 13 Costa Rican passengers killed on January 23rd when the vessel capsized in bad weather. The Reina del Caribe, Spanish for "Caribbean Queen," was carrying 33 people when it went down Saturday amid rain and strong winds as it ferried between the Corn Islands, a popular tourist destination, off Nicaragua's Caribbean coast. The Daily Business Review article can be accessed here=> Daily Business Review article.

The government clarified on the 24th that the boat was carrying 25 Costa Ricans, two Americans, two British citizens, a Brazilian and three Nicaraguans. Previous reports had said there were 32 people on board, including four Americans. All the dead were Costa Ricans.

Nicaragua's naval commander for the southern Caribbean region said the boat's captain was detained because the …