ATHOS I and the Reported Dilemma

On June 9, 2011, Tradewinds reported that Tsakos and the UK Club face a "dilemma" on whether or not to stick with the US government in the long-running pollution case of the ‘Athos I’. As reported by Tradewinds:

"The UK Protection-and-Indemnity (P&I) Club and Greece’s Tsakos Shipping & Trading are faced with a $177m decision in Philadelphia — whether to stick with the US government against oil major Citgo or try to turn against the US and force it to remunerate Tsakos in the costly pollution case of the 60,900-dwt Athos I (built 1983, sold and renamed Gazelle, scrapped 2008). Final appeals are due on Monday in what could shape up as a three-way fight among oil-terminal owner Citgo Asphalt Refining Co, the US government’s Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF) and Tsakos along with the UK Club. So far Tsakos and its P&I insurer have fought as a team alongside the US Department of Justice (DOJ) in a seven-year fight against Citgo. But they lost this first round. In an April decision in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (EDPA) federal court, Citgo and other affiliates won total vindication. Citgo’s damages could have amounted to around $177m. This includes a $45.5m payout by Tsakos and the UK Club, up to the shipowner’s liability cap per gross-registered tonne as prescribed by the US Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90). Further costs were picked up by the OSLTF."

The Tsakos-UK Club-US co-operation is continuing as the co-op filed their appeals on Monday. So despite initial reports, no cracks in the co-op--yet.

If you are interested in reaching me, please contact me at miamipandi@comcast.net or via LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/in/michelleoterovaldes.

Comments

Maritime Law--Florida's Arbitration Code Is Now Revised

Those of us that practice maritime law regularly must always be on the lookout for the contract that may contain an arbitration clause. Thus, any laws related to arbitration are important to those of us practicing in this sector. The Florida legislature has revised the Florida Arbitration Code ("FAC") and named it the Revised Florida Arbitration Code (the " Revised Act"). Since 1967, the FAC had gone mostly unchanged. The Revised Act addresses concepts that were not addressed in the old law, such as the ability of arbitrators to issue provision remedies, challenges based on notice, consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings, required conflict disclosures by arbitrators, among other major changes. The Revised Act lays out a detailed framework for international arbitration conducted under Florida law and repeals sections of the FAC. The Revised Act spells out what experienced arbitrators knew the case law to be, but codifies it all in one pl...

Maritime Law--Lozman Case Revisited in Miami?

In Hoefling v. City of Miami , Case no.: 14-12482 (11th Cir. Jan. 25, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit revived almost all of Hoefling's claims. You ask, "Who is Hoefling?" Hoefling lived on his sailboat Metis O moored off Dinner Key for nearly a decade—until the day he came home and it was gone. About three months earlier, an officer from the Miami Police Department's Marine Patrol Detail tagged Hoefling's vessel for lacking a sanitary device and a working anchor light. He had a deal to use the facilities at the nearby marina but quickly went out and reportedly bought what he needed to comply. Three months later while he was on a business trip, the City of Miami seized and destroyed his boat and all his belongings. As a result, he was homeless. He sued under § 1983, maritime law, and state law. He stated a claim under the Fourth Amendment for seizure and destruction without notice or cause and a “taking.” At the ...

Maritime Law--Novel Rule B Attachment Rejected by Eleventh Circuit

In World Wide Supply OU v. Quail Cruises Ship Management , Case No. 14-14838 (11th Cir. Sept. 30, 2015), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s order vacating an attachment of legal settlement funds. At issue in this appeal was an attachment of property made pursuant to Supplemental Admiralty Rule B. This appeal had a complicated background, involving multiple lawsuits in federal district courts, Florida state court, and a Spanish bankruptcy court. The common denominator of these suits was Quail Cruises Ship Management, from which multiple parties, including participants in the appeal, tried to collect money that they believed Quail owed them. This is not surprising, as there have been numerous cases against Quail due to a failed cruise venture they operated. The money at issue arose from the legal settlement of a dispute over the purchase of a cruise ship featured on ABC Television Network’s long-running series, The Love Boat. The ...

Miami Shipping Law

Search This Blog