Skip to main content

Maritime Law: FMC Proposes New Rules for OTIs--Have You Made Your Views Known?

On May 31, 2013, the United States Federal Maritime Commission ("FMC") issued proposed rulemaking, significantly affecting the licensing, financial responsibility and duties of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries ("OTI"). The rulemaking started a 60-day notice and comment period, ending July 31, 2013, during which affected or interested parties can provide feedback, objections and other comments to the proposed rule. The proposed new rules impose significant new conditions and alter the regulatory environment and risks for OTIs.
Licensing
Under current regulations, an OTI license is for an unlimited term. Under the proposed rules, OTI licenses would have to be renewed every two years. Renewal applications would have to be submitted at least 60 days prior to the expiration date, and would include Qualifying Individual (QI) identification and contact information along with changes to the OTI's business or organization, trade names, tariff publication, physical address and electronic contact data.
Experience requirements for QIs are expanded and are stated in more detail than before. Under current regulations, an OTI's license may be revoked for failing to respond to a lawful order, making false or misleading statements or failing to have a current tariff or bond. The proposed new rules add that an OTI's license may be revoked for processing, booking, accepting or transporting cargo for the account of an NVOCC with knowledge that said NVOCC is not licensed or registered.
The Commission also proposes to streamline the appeals process for any license revocation by eliminating an OTI’s right for a full evidentiary hearing. Instead, the FMC proposes to establish a procedure by which appeals could be handled by a hearing officer on a written record without any apparent right of discovery concerning matters that may be in the FMC’s files.
Financial Responsibility
Financial responsibility levels also increase with the new rules:
  • Ocean Freight Forwarders: from $50,000 to $75,000
  • NVOCCs: from $75,000 to $100,000
  • Registered (foreign) NVOCCs: from $150,000 to $200,000
However, the FMC would eliminate the $10,000 additional bonding required for each unincorporated branch office. The proposed new rules also establish three payment priority tiers for claims against an OTI bond, with shipper and consignee claims given priority over common carriers, ports, terminals and other third-party creditors.
Foreign NVOCCs
Under current regulations, foreign NVOCCs without a physical presence in the United States may operate in U.S. trades without a license if they: (1) file a Form FMC-1; (2) establish a bond of $150,000; and (3) publish an ocean tariff. Under the proposed new rules, a licensed foreign-based NVOCC must establish a U.S. office qualified to do business in the state and operated by a bona fide employee. The registered NVOCC must use a licensed OTI as its agent and registrations must be renewed every two years.
Comments Currently Requested
Given the effects of the new rules, industry participants are strongly encouraged to provide comments. Non-confidential comments must be submitted to the FMC no later than July 31, 2013. Such comments may be submitted confidentially if they are clearly marked as such on each page. After reviewing the comments submitted, the FMC will issue a revised final rule, as well as an effective date for all changes and new requirements.
The proposed rule can be viewed here => OTI Proposed Rulemaking. If you are unable to access the link, if your business is impacted by these new proposed regulations, if you are interested in submitting comments or understanding how these new proposed regulations will affect your operations, please feel free to contact me at mov@chaloslaw.com. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maritime Law--Florida's Arbitration Code Is Now Revised

Those of us that practice maritime law regularly must always be on the lookout for the contract that may contain an arbitration clause. Thus, any laws related to arbitration are important to those of us practicing in this sector.       The Florida legislature has revised the Florida Arbitration Code ("FAC") and named it the Revised Florida Arbitration Code (the " Revised Act"). Since 1967, the FAC had gone mostly unchanged. The Revised Act addresses concepts that were not addressed in the old law, such as the ability of arbitrators to issue provision remedies, challenges based on notice, consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings, required conflict disclosures by arbitrators, among other major changes. The Revised Act lays out a detailed framework for international arbitration conducted under Florida law and repeals sections of the FAC. The Revised Act spells out what experienced arbitrators knew the case law to be, but codifies it all in one pl
4 comments
Read more

Maritime Law--U.S. Crewmember Required to Arbitrate Claims Applying Norwegian Law

In Alberts v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd ., No. 15-14775 (11th Cir. Aug. 23, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a U.S. citizen, working aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise ship is required to arbitrate his claims against Royal Caribbean. Plaintiff, a United States citizen, worked as the lead trumpeter on a passenger Royal Caribbean cruise ship. The ship is a Bahamian flagged vessel with a home port in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Royal Caribbean, the operator of the vessel, is a Liberian corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. After plaintiff became ill while working for Royal Caribbean, he filed suit alleging unseaworthiness, negligence, negligence under the Jones Act, maintenance and cure, and seaman’s wages and penalties. Royal Caribbean moved to compel arbitration, and the district court granted the motion. This appeal presented an issue of first impression: Whether a seaman’s work in international waters on a cruise ship
Post a Comment
Read more

Maritime Law--Jury Hits Royal Caribbean Cruises With $20.3M Verdict for Officer's Hand Injury

In Spearman v. Royal Caribbean Cruises , Case No. 2011-023730-CA-01, a Miami-Dade County, Florida jury has awarded $20.3 million to a former crewmember of Royal Caribbean Cruises, whose hand was crushed while coming to the aid of a fellow worker during an emergency test in 2008. After a three-week trial, the jury found the Miami-based cruise company negligent in operating an unseaworthy ship and 100 percent liable for the injuries suffered by Lisa Spearman, who was working an officer on Royal Caribbean’s Voyager of the Seas . Spearman sued the company in 2011, three years after her right hand was caught in a watertight power door during a fire-safety drill. According to her lawyers, Spearman was trying to prevent the door from closing on the ship’s nurse when her hand was pulled into a recess pocket of the sliding door and crushed.  The nurse allegedly breached the company’s safety protocol when she stumbled through the door, prompting the response from Spearman. Accordin
Post a Comment
Read more