Skip to main content

Maritime Law: Saving American Seafarer Jobs

Last year, Congressman Elijah E. Cummings (D-MD) introduced the Saving Essential American Sailors (SEAS) Act in an effort to repeal section 100125 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act, which reduces the amount of U.S. food aid required to be carried on U.S.-flagged ships from 75 percent to 50 percent. Despite a bipartisan effort, the bill died in committee.

Without the implementation of SEAS and the repeal of the section of MAP-21, it is reported that as many as 2,000 American maritime jobs could be lost and as much as $90 million in lost revenues for U.S.-flag operators. These are figures from the U.S. Maritime Administration. If the offending section of MAP-21 is not repealed, we will have a situation where foreign-owned vessels would have to be depended on by the U.S. to delivery its cargo to our troops overseas. Without the U.S.-flagged sealift capacity, U.S. imports and exports would move solely on foreign shipping lines, many of which are stated-owned lines. The U.S. military would be left dependent on foreign-flagged, foreign-owned ships manned by non-U.S. citizens to carry U.S. military cargoes.

The plight of the loss of the American seafarer has been detailed in numerous publications (Maritime Executive, Marine Log and others), op-eds and other trade papers, but the word does not seem to be  getting out to the general public. I am always met with surprise when I explain this law to ordinary Americans and they ask me "why haven't I heard anything about this?" Without going on a tangent on the "why", it is imperative that we in the maritime industry educate ordinary Americans of what this law means--saving American seafaring jobs.


Popular posts from this blog

Maritime Law--U.S. Crewmember Required to Arbitrate Claims Applying Norwegian Law

In Alberts v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., No. 15-14775 (11th Cir. Aug. 23, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a U.S. citizen, working aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise ship is required to arbitrate his claims against Royal Caribbean.
Plaintiff, a United States citizen, worked as the lead trumpeter on a passenger Royal Caribbean cruise ship. The ship is a Bahamian flagged vessel with a home port in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Royal Caribbean, the operator of the vessel, is a Liberian corporation with its principal place of business in Florida. After plaintiff became ill while working for Royal Caribbean, he filed suit alleging unseaworthiness, negligence, negligence under the Jones Act, maintenance and cure, and seaman’s wages and penalties. Royal Caribbean moved to compel arbitration, and the district court granted the motion. This appeal presented an issue of first impression: Whether a seaman’s work in international waters on a cruise ship that calls o…

Maritime Law--Tour Boat Captain Implicated in Tragedy Off Nicaragua

As reported in the Daily Business Review on January 25, 2016, Nicaragua's police, army and navy will investigate the captain of a tourist boat and his assistant for the deaths of 13 Costa Rican passengers killed on January 23rd when the vessel capsized in bad weather. The Reina del Caribe, Spanish for "Caribbean Queen," was carrying 33 people when it went down Saturday amid rain and strong winds as it ferried between the Corn Islands, a popular tourist destination, off Nicaragua's Caribbean coast. The Daily Business Review article can be accessed here=> Daily Business Review article.

The government clarified on the 24th that the boat was carrying 25 Costa Ricans, two Americans, two British citizens, a Brazilian and three Nicaraguans. Previous reports had said there were 32 people on board, including four Americans. All the dead were Costa Ricans.

Nicaragua's naval commander for the southern Caribbean region said the boat's captain was detained because the …

Maritime Law--Lawsuits Filed Over RCCL's "Storm Cruise"

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd ("RCCL") faces lawsuits by passengers accusing the company of negligently endangering their lives by letting Anthem of the Seas sail into a February 7, 2016 storm.  One class action lawsuit filed in federal court in Miami specifically states that RCCL should be required to pay punitive damages to passengers on its ship for "knowingly sailing directly into" a strong winter storm with 120-mph winds. It is also alleged that people aboard the ship were "subjected to hours of sheer terror as the gigantic cruise ship was battered by hurricane-force winds and more than 30-foot waves."

The vessel reportedly encountered 100 mph winds and 30-foot waves, and RCCL said the storm was more severe than expected. RCCL later turned the ship around, and it returned to New Jersey on February 10. Anthem of the Seas’ port azipod reportedly burnt through “all four clutches” during the storm. RCCL reported four minor injuries among more than 6,000 p…