The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Eckstein Marine Service L.L.C., et al. v. Jackson , Case No. 10-20600 , held that the district court did not err in concluding that the six-month deadline to file a limitation action was triggered when claimant delivered his complaint to plaintiff on April 28, 2009, and that plaintiff's January 18, 2010 petition was untimely filed. The appellate court concluded that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it opted not to hold an evidentiary hearing on claimant's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court. Th is case arose when claimant served plaintiff with a complaint, alleging that his injuries were caused by the unseaworthiness of the M/V St. Andrew and by the negligence of plaintiff and its employees. Claimant became entangled in a line and was pulled into a mooring bit, seriously injuring his left leg. Following a state court trial, claimant won a judgment in excess
This blog discusses the latest trends in shipping, affecting shipowners, operators, ports, marinas, shippers, insurers and others with a stake in the maritime industry.